To grow your business you can trust Fiscalize!
Call Us
+1 (213) 784 2003
Email at
info@fiscalizellp.com
In this article, we will explore mixed-use development, examining differences between retail and residential components and their influence on the financial model.
In this article, we'll delve into mixed-use development, specifically examining the distinctions between retail and residential components and elucidating how these variances should be incorporated into the financial model. Although our focus will be on these two real estate types due to my expertise, it's important to acknowledge that mixed-use developments may encompass office, hospitality, and entertainment spaces, among others.
Mixed-use development stands out as an attractive choice for both developers and investors, as it optimizes a property's potential by accommodating multiple functions. For instance, a mixed-use building might feature a retail store on the ground floor, offices on the intermediate levels, and residential units on the top floors.
A paramount advantage of mixed-use development lies in its ability to foster a lively and dynamic community. The amalgamation of residential and commercial spaces ensures convenient access to services and amenities for residents, while simultaneously providing local businesses with a readily available customer base.
Moreover, mixed-use developments contribute to the reduction of traffic congestion and carbon emissions. By integrating living, working, and shopping spaces within close proximity, individuals are less inclined to undertake extensive driving, consequently diminishing the need for lengthy car journeys.
From an investment standpoint, mixed-use properties present a more diversified, stable, and reliable income source. The inclusion of a diverse array of tenants or essential services for residents mitigates the risk of vacancies. Even if one type of tenant departs, other sources of income remain, bolstering overall financial stability.
While mixed-use developments offer numerous advantages, they also pose certain challenges. One of the primary hurdles involves navigating zoning regulations, which can complicate the integration of various property types within a single development. Furthermore, developers must ensure the compatibility of each use to prevent conflicts among tenants and residents.
Another challenge lies in designing a building that is flexible enough to accommodate diverse uses. Commercial properties may have distinct requirements compared to residential ones, particularly concerning heating, ventilation, and air conditioning. This can result in additional design and material costs, factors that should be carefully considered in the financial model.
Despite these challenges, the mixed-use model is gaining popularity due to its benefits for developers, investors, and communities.
The feasibility models for residential and retail development exhibit several distinctions. The fundamental disparity lies in the core objective: residential development centers on creating living units for individuals, whereas retail development concentrates on establishing spaces for business operations.
This foundational contrast profoundly influences the feasibility models for both development types. In the following sections, I will delve into the distinctions between these models, providing insights into how they manifest in feasibility assessments. However, it's important to note that I will approach these differences from a theoretical standpoint rather than delving into the technical mechanics typically found in an Excel file.
Income sources vary between residential and retail developments. In residential development, the primary income stream is derived from rental payments for the units. The feasibility analysis typically incorporates monthly rental figures, taking into account variables like unit mix and prevailing market rates to compute annual income.
Conversely, for retail developments, income is generated through lease payments from businesses occupying the space. This revenue is often calculated on an annual basis per square foot, facilitating the derivation of key metrics such as rent by tenant type. Retail revenue tends to be more variable compared to residential income, as it hinges on the success of businesses. Percentage rent arrangements can align the interests of landlords and tenants, with both parties benefiting from increased sales and foot traffic.
Costs associated with residential and retail development diverge beyond land acquisition. Residential development costs are predominantly centered around construction and marketing, whereas retail development costs encompass construction, marketing, and tenant improvement expenses. Tenant improvement costs entail modifications to the space to align with the specific requirements of the business occupying it.
Mixed-use developments, characterized by their complexity, often incur elevated construction costs, consultant fees for permitting, and design-related expenses. Notably, in the retail sector, tenants, particularly those focused on dining, commonly incur higher tenant improvement costs.
Financing for residential and retail development diverges significantly. Residential development financing is generally more accessible and cost-effective, given its lower perceived risk compared to retail development. Retail development financing tends to be more intricate, requiring lenders to evaluate the creditworthiness of businesses occupying the space and their capacity to meet rent obligations, resulting in higher interest rates. The costs, including interest rates, for mixed-use developments typically fall between those of specialized retail or multifamily residential developments.
The demand for residential development is propelled by population growth and demographic shifts. On the other hand, the demand for retail development is influenced by consumer behavior, encompassing shopping habits and spending patterns. Factors such as competition from other retail spaces in the vicinity and market/demographic considerations, such as the average household income in the area, can also exert an impact on the demand for retail space. Successful mixed-use development, coupled with a well-curated tenant mix, has the potential to leverage and amplify the demand for the area. In this context, comprehensive market research plays a pivotal role in guiding mixed-use development projects within a specific market.
Residential development is typically considered less risky than retail development, primarily due to the consistently higher demand for housing compared to retail space. The success of retail development is intricately linked to the prosperity of the businesses occupying the space, making it susceptible to economic conditions and competitive pressures. Mitigating this risk involves attracting retail tenants that focus on essential services. For instance, numerous mixed-use developments strategically draw in retail tenants offering services such as food, salons/barbershops, dry cleaning, and healthcare.
At my previous company, we were in possession of an aging shopping center that enjoyed substantial foot traffic due to its advantageous location. Recognizing the increasing rental rates, a shortage of residential spaces in the market, and a growing local population, we made the strategic decision to pivot towards a mixed-use redevelopment, incorporating a residential component.
Anticipating favorable tailwinds for permitting costs, we leveraged our positive relationship with the local government, whose interests aligned with ours. We assessed demand factors and successfully mitigated risks by scrutinizing the local market outlook and maintaining a positive regulatory body relationship.
To enhance transparency regarding revenue, I implemented separate tabs for each revenue model portion, elucidating distinct revenue streams. While costs posed a challenge to segregate, we observed that the per square foot cost exceeded our usual benchmark. Ultimately, the project's yield stabilized at around 7.5%, aligning with benchmarked returns for each product type.
Exploring potential external financing options, we discovered that the quoted rates were notably lower than those for a project solely focused on expanding retail space.
The feasibility models for residential and retail development exhibit distinctions across various facets, encompassing revenue streams, costs, financing, demand, and risk. Although this article doesn't provide an exhaustive list, its objective is to underscore the primary differences, offering readers a comprehensive overview. Developers and investors are advised to meticulously analyze these factors when evaluating a project's feasibility and gauging its potential return on investment. Grasping these distinctions is pivotal for the successful development of a project and enhancing the likelihood of success in the realm of mixed-use development.